← All playbooks
Observability and error tracking migration

Sentry → Datadog

Move applications, services, and entity identity, metrics and metric types, logs, parsing, and pipelines, traces, spans, and sampling, errors, issues, releases, and source maps, dashboards, queries, and variables, monitors, alert conditions, and notifications, slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy from Sentry to Datadog with a reversible cutover, explicit exception ledger, and evidence-backed verification.

Typical timeline15–45 business days70–180 hours active work
Statusneeds review
Source profileSentry documentation reviewed 2026-07-20
Destination profileDatadog documentation reviewed 2026-07-20
Documentation date
Review window
Evidence2 sources
This route needs review.Use it as a planning baseline, then verify the dated sources and test with representative data before production.
Before you migrate

Should you make this move?

Both platforms have a case. Compare what you gain with what you give up before scheduling the cutover.

Current platform

Sentry

Reasons to stay
  • Developer-focused error tracking, traces, releases, profiling, and source-code context accelerate debugging
  • Centralized telemetry, dashboards, alerts, and incident signals shorten diagnosis time
Reasons to leave
  • Issue grouping, event quotas, release setup, and historical error state are vendor-specific
  • Historical telemetry, query languages, alert behavior, and instrumentation do not move cleanly
New platform

Datadog

What gets better
  • Broad infrastructure, APM, logs, security, dashboards, and integrations offer a unified operational view
  • Centralized telemetry, dashboards, alerts, and incident signals shorten diagnosis time
What gets worse
  • Usage-based pricing, product sprawl, and proprietary queries can become difficult to govern
  • Historical telemetry, query languages, alert behavior, and instrumentation do not move cleanly
Best of the move

Datadog: Broad infrastructure, APM, logs, security, dashboards, and integrations offer a unified operational view. This removes a major source-side concern: Issue grouping, event quotas, release setup, and historical error state are vendor-specific.

Worst of the move

What you lose: Developer-focused error tracking, traces, releases, profiling, and source-code context accelerate debugging. What you inherit: Usage-based pricing, product sprawl, and proprietary queries can become difficult to govern.

Jump to a section
01At a glance

Know the shape of the move.

Transfer outcome10 features audited
Transfer outcome distributionClean transfer: 0, Partial transfer: 6, Manual rebuild: 3, Not transferred: 1.
Clean0
Partial6
Manual3
Lost1
Mapping route8 of 9 fields have a destination path

This timeline assumes

  • Up to 2,000 services, 1,000 dashboards, 5,000 alerts, and 100 TB of retained telemetry
  • Administrators control both Sentry and Datadog, including billing, identity, APIs, integrations, and export permissions.
  • Sentry remains intact and recoverable until Datadog completes one representative operating cycle.
  • A production-shaped pilot includes every object type, access class, edge case, and failure path.
  • The migration team preserves stable source identifiers and records durable evidence for every blocking check.
02What transfers

What survives the move.

“Partial” and “manual” are not footnotes. They are work that must be scheduled and verified.

ItemOutcomeImpactWhat happensMitigation
Applications, services, and entity identitypartialcriticalService names, environments, releases, hosts, containers, and ownership tags must be normalized. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map applications, services, and entity identity explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Metrics and metric typespartialcriticalCounters, gauges, distributions, rollups, cardinality, units, and retention behave differently. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map metrics and metric types explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Logs, parsing, and pipelinespartialcriticalCollection agents, parsing rules, enrichment, redaction, archives, and indexes require redesign. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map logs, parsing, and pipelines explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Traces, spans, and samplingpartialcriticalInstrumentation, propagation, sampling, service maps, and trace retention are not portable history. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map traces, spans, and sampling explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Errors, issues, releases, and source mapspartialcriticalGrouping algorithms, fingerprints, release health, source maps, and issue state differ. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map errors, issues, releases, and source maps explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Dashboards, queries, and variablespartialhighDashboard JSON can move only after query languages, widget types, and entity references are translated. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Map dashboards, queries, and variables explicitly, pilot every feature class, and reconcile accepted, changed, rejected, and excluded items.
Monitors, alert conditions, and notificationsmanualcriticalThresholds, evaluation windows, anomaly models, muting, routing, and escalation require reconstruction. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Inventory and rebuild monitors, alert conditions, and notifications, then test normal, edge, failure, and rollback behavior.
SLOs, incidents, and burn-rate policymanualcriticalSLI definitions, error budgets, incident objects, and burn alerts use different semantics. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Inventory and rebuild slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy, then test normal, edge, failure, and rollback behavior.
Historical telemetry and baselineslosthighLarge retained telemetry datasets rarely transfer into native destination storage. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Archive historical telemetry and baselines as dated source evidence and define the new destination baseline.
Agents, API keys, integrations, and cost controlsmanualcriticalCollectors, secrets, cloud integrations, quotas, indexes, and retention policies must switch deliberately. A successful bulk job therefore does not prove semantic parity between Sentry and Datadog.Inventory and rebuild agents, api keys, integrations, and cost controls, then test normal, edge, failure, and rollback behavior.
03Field and feature mapping

Where each thing goes.

SourceDestinationMethodNotes
Sentry: Applications, services, and entity identityDatadog: approved applications, services, and entity identity representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for applications, services, and entity identity.
Sentry: Metrics and metric typesDatadog: approved metrics and metric types representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for metrics and metric types.
Sentry: Logs, parsing, and pipelinesDatadog: approved logs, parsing, and pipelines representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for logs, parsing, and pipelines.
Sentry: Traces, spans, and samplingDatadog: approved traces, spans, and sampling representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for traces, spans, and sampling.
Sentry: Errors, issues, releases, and source mapsDatadog: approved errors, issues, releases, and source maps representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for errors, issues, releases, and source maps.
Sentry: Dashboards, queries, and variablesDatadog: approved dashboards, queries, and variables representationtransformPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for dashboards, queries, and variables.
Sentry: Monitors, alert conditions, and notificationsDatadog: approved monitors, alert conditions, and notifications representationmanualPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for monitors, alert conditions, and notifications.
Sentry: SLOs, incidents, and burn-rate policyDatadog: approved slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy representationmanualPreserve source IDs, ownership, timestamps, access intent, and an explicit exception status for slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy.
Sentry: Historical telemetry and baselinesNo destinationunsupportedRetain immutable source evidence; do not manufacture destination-native history.
04Before you begin

Make the move recoverable.

Backup procedure

Create the source-of-truth backup

Preserve Sentry data, configuration, access, and operating evidence before any destination write.

  1. Export every available Sentry object and binary in scope, including applications, services, and entity identity, metrics and metric types, logs, parsing, and pipelines, traces, spans, and sampling.
  2. Capture configuration and runtime dependencies for errors, issues, releases, and source maps, dashboards, queries, and variables, monitors, alert conditions, and notifications, slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy.
  3. Record counts, sizes, owners, timestamps, access classes, financial totals where applicable, and known exceptions.
  4. Hash immutable exports, record tool versions and commands, and transform working copies only.

Proof to capture: A signed manifest accounts for every scoped record class, configuration object, binary, count, total, exception, and hash.

Transformation · Version-controlled migration workbook, SQL, or typed transformation code

Identity, schema, and disposition registry

Preserve stable identity and make every mapping or exclusion reviewable.

  1. Inventory source types, identifiers, owners, states, and access.
  2. Define one approved destination representation or explicit archive decision.
  3. Reject unmapped critical items and produce an exception ledger.

Proof to capture: Save the input, output, command or tool settings, warnings, and final item counts.

Transformation · Official APIs, provider importers, checksums, and reconciliation scripts

Dependency-ordered migration package

Load prerequisite identities and configuration before dependent records and runtime actions.

  1. Normalize encoding, timestamps, identifiers, nulls, and destination limits.
  2. Run a representative pilot and retain request, response, and rejection evidence.
  3. Reconcile the final delta before enabling destination production writers.

Proof to capture: Save the input, output, command or tool settings, warnings, and final item counts.

05Handle with care

The things most likely to hurt.

These are operating limits. Treat every “Stop if” condition as a blocked migration, not a suggestion.

Import

A completed migration hides missing or altered applications, services, and entity identity

criticalpossible likelihood

Headline counts look plausible while semantic, access, or relationship checks fail.

Consequence
The destination becomes authoritative with incomplete or misleading business data.
Mitigation
Reconcile by type, state, owner, access class, and representative record rather than total count alone.

Stop if: Any critical item lacks a verified destination, approved transformation, explicit exclusion, or recoverable archive.

Cutover

Sentry and Datadog both perform production actions

criticalpossible likelihood

Users, schedules, webhooks, integrations, or traffic continue changing both systems.

Consequence
State diverges or customers receive duplicate, contradictory, or unsafe actions.
Mitigation
Freeze source writers and transfer one production owner at a time with an approved rollback.

Stop if: An unapproved source writer or destination duplicate action appears after the freeze.

Verification

Destination access or security is broader than approved

criticalpossible likelihood

A representative restricted user can read, change, export, or trigger an unauthorized item.

Consequence
Confidential, regulated, financial, or security-sensitive data is exposed or changed.
Mitigation
Apply least privilege before bulk loading and test every access class using ordinary identities.

Stop if: Any unauthorized read, write, export, administrative action, or secret access succeeds.

06Precise timeline

Do the work in this order.

Estimate forUp to 2,000 services, 1,000 dashboards, 5,000 alerts, and 100 TB of retained telemetry
Total elapsed15–45 business days
Active work70–180 hours
BufferAdd time for large Sentry exports, destination rate limits, unsupported features, identity exceptions, regulated data, or a strict downtime objective.
01
Days 1–4Inventory and decisions2–4 days
02
Days 3–8Backup and reconcile2–5 days
03
Days 6–20Map, transform, and pilot5–12 days
04
Days 18–35Bulk load, final delta, and switch2–8 days
05
Days 25–45Observe and close7–14 days
  1. Days 1–4 · inventory

    Inventory and decisions

    8–16 hours active2–4 days elapsedOwner, legal, security, and finance review waiting
    • Inventory Sentry data, configuration, identities, integrations, limits, and billing.
    • Approve scope, owners, mappings, exclusions, acceptance thresholds, and rollback authority.

    Depends on: Sentry and Datadog administrator access

    Stop / go checkpoint

    Export?

    Go when: Every critical item and production action has an owner and disposition.

    Stop when: Authority, retention, billing, access, or system ownership is unclear.

  2. Days 3–8 · backup

    Backup and reconcile

    8–20 hours active2–5 days elapsedProvider export processing waiting
    • Create immutable data, configuration, binary, and audit exports.
    • Reconcile source counts, totals, sizes, access classes, and hashes.

    Depends on: Approved inventory and retention location

    Stop / go checkpoint

    Transform?

    Go when: The signed source manifest and exports agree.

    Stop when: Any critical dataset, binary, configuration, or recovery path is absent.

  3. Days 6–20 · pilot

    Map, transform, and pilot

    25–70 hours active5–12 days elapsedDestination processing and owner review waiting
    • Configure Datadog and transform a production-shaped pilot.
    • Test normal records, every feature class, edge cases, permissions, failures, and rollback.

    Depends on: Verified source backup and approved mapping registry

    Stop / go checkpoint

    Scale?

    Go when: Every pilot mapping and blocking verification check passes.

    Stop when: Any critical invariant, access boundary, or production action lacks a safe destination.

  4. Days 18–35 · cutover

    Bulk load, final delta, and switch

    20–55 hours active2–8 days elapsedImports, propagation, indexing, or synchronization waiting
    • Freeze production writes and automated actions in Sentry.
    • Apply and reconcile the final delta, switch ownership to Datadog, and run all blocking checks.

    Depends on: Passed pilot, stakeholder go decision, and rehearsed rollback

    Stop / go checkpoint

    Open production?

    Go when: Datadog is the sole production owner and every critical exception is resolved.

    Stop when: A source writer remains active, a blocking check fails, or rollback is unavailable.

  5. Days 25–45 · observe

    Observe and close

    9–19 hours active7–14 days elapsedRepresentative operating-cycle evidence waiting
    • Monitor correctness, access, failures, latency, delivery, cost, and user outcomes.
    • Sign the verification report and close rollback only after stable evidence.

    Depends on: Verified cutover

    Stop / go checkpoint

    Close rollback?

    Go when: No trigger occurs during the approved observation period.

    Stop when: Data, access, delivery, routing, cost, or business results regress.

07The point of change

Cut over with a way back.

Go live

Cutover

Make Datadog the only production system without losing the final Sentry delta.

Recommended window: A low-volume weekday morning with platform, data, security, networking, finance, and business owners available.

  1. Freeze user, integration, schedule, and API writes in Sentry.
  2. Capture and reconcile the final source delta against the last verified checkpoint.
  3. Apply the approved delta and configuration changes to Datadog.
  4. Switch traffic, domains, integrations, credentials, automation, and user entry points in dependency order.
  5. Run every blocking verification check and keep the source intact.

Proof to capture: Datadog alone owns production, totals reconcile, exceptions are signed, and every blocking check has durable evidence.

Return to safety

Rollback

Return production ownership to Sentry without losing destination-era changes.

Deadline: Within seven days and before source data, plans, credentials, domains, keys, or retention settings are changed.

  1. Stop new user, integration, schedule, and API writes in Datadog.
  2. Restore prior Sentry traffic, domains, credentials, automation, and integration ownership.
  3. Export and classify the Datadog post-cutover delta.
  4. Apply safe destination-era changes back to Sentry without duplicating actions.
  5. Run the same blocking checks against the restored source.

Proof to capture: Sentry again owns production with current data and no duplicate destination action.

Rollback immediately when
  • Unexplained critical count, value, relationship, or checksum variance
  • Missing, corrupted, or exposed critical data
  • Duplicate production action or unresolved split-brain state
  • Failed access, security, delivery, routing, performance, or integration check
  • A critical feature has no safe destination replacement or rollback path
08Verification report

Prove the migration worked.

Every blocking check must pass. Capture the evidence before cleanup begins.

0%
Interactive report preview0 / 8 checks passed
PassIDCheckMethodExpected resultEvidence
V-01BlockingApplications, services, and entity identity reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for applications, services, and entity identity.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Applications, services, and entity identity ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-02BlockingMetrics and metric types reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for metrics and metric types.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Metrics and metric types ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-03BlockingLogs, parsing, and pipelines reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for logs, parsing, and pipelines.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Logs, parsing, and pipelines ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-04BlockingTraces, spans, and sampling reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for traces, spans, and sampling.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Traces, spans, and sampling ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-05BlockingErrors, issues, releases, and source maps reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for errors, issues, releases, and source maps.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Errors, issues, releases, and source maps ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-06Dashboards, queries, and variables reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for dashboards, queries, and variables.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Dashboards, queries, and variables ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-07BlockingMonitors, alert conditions, and notifications reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for monitors, alert conditions, and notifications.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.Monitors, alert conditions, and notifications ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
V-08BlockingSLOs, incidents, and burn-rate policy reconciliationCompare source inventory, transformed output, destination results, and a stratified sample for slos, incidents, and burn-rate policy.Every in-scope item is present, intentionally transformed, explicitly excluded, or retained in the signed source archive.SLOs, incidents, and burn-rate policy ledger with counts, exceptions, sample IDs, and owner sign-off.
09Post-migration cleanup

Remove the scaffolding safely.

Safe after: One complete operating cycle, at least seven stable days, and owner sign-off on every blocking check and exception.

  1. Create final Sentry exports and archive verification, access, financial, and rollback evidence.
  2. Revoke temporary credentials, API keys, webhooks, elevated roles, and migration network access.
  3. Remove obsolete jobs, embeds, domains, integrations, collectors, routes, and DNS records.
  4. Keep the source intact and read-only through the approved legal and operational retention window.
  5. Cancel paid plans only after billing, legal, security, evidence, and recovery review.
  6. Schedule the next Datadog backup, restore test, access review, and migration-playbook review.
Sources and evidence

Verify against the primary material.

Platform behavior changes. Check these sources and the review dates above before executing a production migration.

  1. Sentry: official portability and migration documentationAccessed 2026-07-20
  2. Datadog: official portability and migration documentationAccessed 2026-07-20